Duckworth, Durbin, Senate Dems Condemn Trump Administration Move to Help Businesses Steal Billions of Dollars in Tips from Workers
Democrats decry the move as another example of the Trump Administration putting corporate interests ahead of workers
[WASHINGTON, D.C.] — U.S. Senators Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) joined 22 of their Senate colleagues in writing to Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta, criticizing the Department of Labor’s decision to cover up evidence showing its proposed change to the tip rules would result in employers stealing potentially billions of dollars from their workers. The move exposes the Trump Administration’s true priority—helping pad the pockets of corporate interests while working families are left behind
“We write to express our deep concern regarding reports that the Department of Labor (DOL) concealed evidence from the public showing that DOL’s proposed tip rule would result in employees losing billions of dollars in tips,” wrote the Senators. “DOL is forcing through a regulation that would take money out of the pockets of low-wage workers and, even worse, it covered up the potentially catastrophic impacts from workers and advocates. This is a stark example of how far the Trump Administration is willing to go to appease business interests at the expense of working families.”
In addition to Senators Duckworth and Durbin, the letter was signed by Senators Murray (D-WA), Schumer (D-NY), Feinstein (D-CA), Wyden (D-OR), Reed (D-RI), Sanders (I-VT), Cardin (D-MD), Brown (D-OH), Shaheen (D-NH), Merkley (D-OR), Gillibrand (D-NY), Blumenthal (D-CT), Baldwin (D-WI), Murphy (D-CT), Hirono (D-HI), Kaine (D-VA), Warren (D-MA), Markey (D-MA), Booker (D-NJ), Van Hollen (D-MD), Hassan (D-NH), and Smith (D-MN).
The full text of the letter is below and the PDF can be found here.
February 6, 2018
The Honorable R. Alexander Acosta
Secretary of Labor
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20210
Dear Secretary Acosta:
We write to express our deep concern regarding reports that the Department of Labor (DOL) concealed evidence from the public showing that DOL’s proposed tip rule would result in employees losing billions of dollars in tips. DOL is forcing through a regulation that would take money out of the pockets of low-wage workers and, even worse, it covered up the potentially catastrophic impacts from workers and advocates. This is a stark example of how far the Trump Administration is willing to go to appease business interests at the expense of working families.
In December, DOL proposed a rule that would rescind portions of its tip regulations that protect tipped workers. These low-wage workers—two-thirds of whom are women—struggle to support themselves and their families, experiencing poverty rates twice as high as rates for all working people. Workers rely on their tips as a major source of income, they work extremely hard to earn them, and they deserve to keep them. The existing tip regulations make clear that tips are the property of employees, ensuring that employers are not able to confiscate employees’ tips and use them as they please. These regulations are essential to ensuring that workers across the country who receive tips at their jobs earn a fair wage by being able to keep their tips.
DOL provided the public with no quantitative economic analysis in its proposed rule, contrary to multiple Executive Orders on rulemaking procedures, stating that DOL “currently lacks data to quantify possible reallocation of tips[.]” However, according to news reports, DOL did conduct this quantitative analysis and found the rule would result in workers losing billions of dollars if it is finalized. Instead of allowing the public to provide feedback on this impact on workers, DOL reportedly chose to bury the analysis and instead issue the proposed rule that stated that uncertainties were too great to perform an analysis. After the proposed rule was released, Senator Murray, as Ranking Member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, specifically asked DOL if any such data existed or analysis had been conducted. DOL has yet to respond.
Many of us already are on record expressing our deep concerns that DOL, which has as its mission “[t]o foster, promote, and develop the welfare of wage earners … of the United States,” would propose a rule that it was aware would cost workers billions of dollars each year. However, the idea that officials at DOL—potentially including yourself—would take steps to mislead the public and deprive them of information about the impacts of the rule leads us to the unavoidable conclusion that you must act to withdraw this rule.
Next Article Previous Article