July 14, 2025

Duckworth, Booker, SFRC Colleagues Demand Answers Regarding State Department Layoffs

 

[WASHINGTON, D.C.] – U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) joined U.S. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) and their fellow members of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) in writing a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressing deep concerns with imminent Reductions in Force (RIFs) at the State Department and requested answers on the Trump Administration’s process for carrying out these layoffs. 

The Senators wrote: “RIFs should remain a tool of last resort, and if implemented must be conducted according to long-standing procedures that prioritize transparency and a merit-based process for both career civil service employees and Foreign Service Officers (FSOs). During a time of increasingly complex and wide-spread challenges to U.S. national security, this administration should be strengthening our diplomatic corps—an irreplaceable instrument of U.S. power and leadership—not weakening it. However, RIFs would severely undermine the Department’s ability to achieve U.S. foreign policy interests, putting our nation’s security, strength, and prosperity at risk.”

Since January, the Foreign Service has shrunk by nearly 25 percent and the number of civil service employees has also decreased due to agency closures, early retirement and buyouts. 

The Senators requested a response to the following questions by no later than July 18, 2025: 

RIF Criteria:

  1. When were RIF lists created, by whom, and against what criteria?
  2. Is the Department choosing to RIF based on current office assignment rather than globally ranking FSOs and civil servants based on grade and skillsets?  If so, why?
  3. Are the lists being updated to reflect Permanent Changes in Station (PCS) or curtailments?
  4. How many veterans and consular coned generalists are included on the list?
  5. It can take years of training for an FSO or civil servant to master diplomatic and negotiation skills, including obtaining fluency in critical languages. Why are skilled officers, including those with specialized language skills not being reassigned? How will the Department fill these specialized skill and experience gaps?

Foreign Service Officers:

  1. Why is the administration preventing FSOs from transferring into critical vacancies?
  2. Why is the administration preventing candidates who accepted a “handshake” from being paneled to a position they were chosen for based on merit?
  3. What is the rationale for conducting RIFs before the reorganization takes effect?
  4. How many vacant FSO positions will there be worldwide after RIFs are processed? How does the Department plan to fill mission critical posts?
  5. Why is the Department processing RIFs prior to determining the number of vacant positions remaining following your reorganization efforts?
  6. How is the Department protecting the pipeline of FSOs to ensure no critical skill gaps in the future?

Civil Service:

  1. Civil service employees often come to the Department with specialized experience.  How is the Department working to retain critical, hard to replace employees in the civil service?
  2. How is the Department working to ensure key specialties, knowledge, and personnel are retained and transferred during the reorganization?
  3. Why is the Department refusing to process any lateral moves by civil service employees who have been offered other civil service positions within the Department?
  4. If reducing waste, fraud, and abuse is the goal of the reorganization, why is the Department not efficiently allowing these experienced civil service employees to laterally move into vacant positions they were chosen for based on merit?
  5. If remaining officers are going to be asked to take on additional work, how will they be remunerated for their time and effort? 
  6. Will the hiring and lateral transition freezes be lifted once RIFs are complete?

Reassignment Process:

  1. Will there be a competitive reassignment for high-performing, mission-critical personnel following the RIFs?  If so, what is the timeline and criteria for this reassignment process?  How will the Department communicate these details with its employees?

The letter is cosigned by SFRC Ranking Member Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) and U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-DE), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Brian Schatz (D-HI) and Jacky Rosen (D-NV).

The full text of the letter is available on Senator Duckworth’s website. 

-30-